Why this blog will fail

I did not jump into this blogging business blind.  No, I looked at other blogs, too, and it seems that the ones that are successful and engaging are the niche blogs: blogs of bodybuilders, unicyclists, Las Vegas courtesans (seriously).

This is why this blog will fail.  I am not, like the courtesan, an expert in any one field, and therefore cannot speak authoritatively on any one subject that a specific audience would find engaging. As a Jack-of-all-trades, I will not be the singular voice for—or the critic of—a community.

A better activist than call girl, I also checked out the blogs of the activist circle of the blogferno. There are two types of these blogs: ones that focus solely on the political/scientific aspect of important issues (environmental legislation, peak oil) and ones that focus solely on lifestyle (yoga, macrobiotic dog food recipes).  The former keeps one informed, but unsure of how to apply this education productively.  The latter keeps one wholly focused on ones’ own lifestyle, and frequently makes assumptions on socio-economic class.  Both often carry the preachy tone implying that “their way” is the best and only way to be.

What is especially frustrating is having one foot in both the “activist” world and the other in the “non-activist” world.  To activists, I don’t go far enough in my ideals.  I am hypocrite or a hanger-on.  To the non-activists, I am assumed to be disdainful, judgmental, a recycled-paper bible thumper.

Listen.  I’ve been doing this activism thing awhile, and while I fret both about my personal impact on the world and on the larger systemic issues that I am just a cog in (racial discrimination, environmental degradation), I also see no (fatal) contradiction between deconstructing patriarchy by day and discussing the finer (cruder?) points of the Jersey Shore by night.

You can balance.  I’m not saying I’m the best at it, but I’m saying thus far it has sort of worked.  I will never be the expert or the wise social critic.  This blog is not meant to be consciously instructive as much as it is meant to be an example that political/social activism and being a “normal” person are not mutually exclusive. The personal is political. Activists are not merely condescending ideologues, nor are Beyoncé fans one-dimensionally superficial, and both sides really lose out by painting the other as such, or even thinking about it in terms of sides.

It is a defense mechanism.  If everyone who watches the Jersey Shore is an insipid pop-culture valley girl, then you effectively separate yourself from that group and do not have to engage them nor seek balancing that with being an activist, and vice-versa.

That is what this blog is: not an instructive voice written from one niche lifestyle perspective, but an experiment in balancing the personal and the political, the personal interests with the public responsibilities.  And it is a balance that must continually be re-struck.


About Big Adam

A NYC doorman, a community organizer, wannabe ape, sometimes blogger, sometimes writer, always crossword puzzle incompleter, I will ride bicycles with your papa, dance Bhangra with your mama, take you on dates that cost nada.
This entry was posted in Living Deliberately and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Why this blog will fail

  1. candypandy says:

    I came across your blog on the homepage and I must say… I adored this post.

    Bravo 🙂

  2. sweetsobsessed says:

    This post could almost be included in your about section; it’s such a great illustration of your intention. I like your disclaimer about being “an instructive voice” : I like the phrase and I like the thought! That kind of tone in a blog always seem pretentious. (And now I want to go change my about section so that no one mistakes me for an instructive voice either!) But aren’t you making it all a bit too black and white? For someone who prefers a balance of perspective, I’m surprised you don’t see the wide-open space between a wildly successful, trendy blog and one that is a complete failure. It seems to me that a blog which offers an open and engaging look at life has great appeal – and judging by the comments I see here, I’m not the only one. 🙂

    • big Adam says:

      thanks!…will soon be taking your subtle hint and updating my “about” section to be a little bit more explanatory….I am trying my best not to be pedantic or pretentious (unsolicited advice is a family tradition, unfortunately)….As for the black and white issue, part of that is certainly me failing to resist the temptation of a catchy title. but yes, you are right that there is a middle ground, i think i’m just not sure how to define that or, indeed, if that’s what I’m going for..
      At any rate, thanks for the encouragement, and hope to check out your blog, although I couldn’t seem to find it?

      • sweetsobsessed says:

        Have to admit, it is a catchy title! 🙂 You’ve already been on my blog, though – at any rate, you left a comment. http://sweetsobsessed.wordpress.com? It’s called Sin Without Sugar.

      • big Adam says:

        ah, I remembered right after I wrote that comment, I just couldn’t link to it from the comment, and was trying to figure out how I managed that…for having a blog, the computer is a bit daunting sometimes

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s